| Course Name | Year | Term | Period | Faculty / Graduate School | All Instructors | Credits |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12544:[2025 Spring]IR18‐BA101 English for International Studies I (Advanced)(RF) | 2025 | Spring | Mon4,Thu1 | College Of International Relations | IKEDA YOSHIKO | 2 |
Campus
Class Venue
Language
Course Outline and Method
Information for “+R-Jugyo” will be posted on the “Course News” on manaba+R by April 1. Be sure to check the “Course News” on manaba+R.
The aim of English for International Studies is to develop a high-level command of English which will allow students to deepen their knowledge of International Relations. Students engage in an active learning process through an integrated approach to reading, listening, speaking, and writing skills. Among these skills, EIS I focuses particularly on reading skills. We will read From Critical Thinking to Argument (2013), which illustrates critical thinking, encourages active reading, and shows how to get deeper into arguments. We will also view several great speeches of the 20th and the 21st century. Based on argumentative theories provided by this book, we will analyze these speeches and discuss the rhetorical strategies used to persuade people to make specific changes in the world. Students will give a presentation on a speech of their choice and write a 1000-word research paper on the speech. While exploring these speeches, students will enhance critical thinking and learn the basic features of civic discourse as well as improving their writing and presentation skills.
Student Attainment Objectives
1. Students will be able to read intensively and critically.
2. Students will build the vocabulary necessary for reading academic materials.
3. Students will acquire basic knowledge of argumentation.
4. Students will be able to write a 1000-word academic paper by APA Style.
Recommended Preparatory Course
Course Schedule
| Lecture/Instructor(When there are multiple instructors) | Theme |
|---|---|
| Keyword, References and Supplementary Information | |
| 1 | Introduction to the course: |
Donald Trump's Joint Address to Congress
|
|
| 2 | Worksheet: Group sheet #1 Team Project |
Introduce your friend (1 min) and make a PowerPoint file. |
|
| 3 | From Critical Thinking to Argument-1 (pp.1-10) |
What is critical thinking? Definition and Image mapping
|
|
| 4 | Freeman case-1 (Case-reading-1) PDF file in Content |
Freeman vs. Florida for Freeman
|
|
| 5 | Freeman case-2 (Case-reading-2) PDF file in Content |
Freeman vs. Florida State for Florida State
|
|
| 6 | From Critical Thinking to Argument -2 (pp.10-23) |
What are topics?
|
|
| 7 | From Critical Thinking to Argument -3 (pp.23-32) |
Critical Reading Strategies
|
|
| 8 | From Critical Thinking to Argument -4 (pp.39-54) |
Active Reading
|
|
| 9 | From Critical Thinking to Argument-5 (pp.56-60) |
Amendment Junkie-1
|
|
| 10 | From Critical Thinking to Argument-6 (pp.60-61) |
Amendment Junkie-2
|
|
| 11 | Aristotle's On Rhetoric(pp.1-7) |
Historical approach-1
|
|
| 12 | Aristotle's On Rhetoric (pp.7-16) |
Historical approach-2
|
|
| 13 | Aristotle’s On Rhetoric (pp.27-36) |
Paradigm/syllogism
|
|
| 14 | Aristotle’s On Rhetoric (pp.37-46) |
Three kinds of rhetoric
|
|
| 15 | Aristotle’s On Rhetoric (pp.46-52) |
Ethos, pathos, and logos
|
|
| 16 | “Declaration of War” by Franklin D. Roosevelt |
Definition, Description and Argument
|
|
| 17 | From Critical Thinking to Argument-7 (pp.70-81) |
Persuasion, Reason vs. Rationalization, Definition
|
|
| 18 | From Critical Thinking to Argument -8 (pp.81-88) |
Assumptions, premises, syllogisms and enthymemes
|
|
| 19 | From Critical Thinking to Argument -8 (pp.88-102) and Essay 1:"True or False" |
Logos-1: Induction and evidence
|
|
| 20 | From Critical Thinking to Argument -9 (pp.83-84) and Essay 2: "It's all about him" |
Logos-2: Deduction
|
|
| 21 | Paper Assignment #1 (Due) |
Peer Review and Plagiarism |
|
| 22 | Nelson Mandela's "An Ideal for which I am prepared to die"-1 |
Logos-1
|
|
| 23 | Mandela's "An Ideal for which I am prepared to die"-2 |
Logos-2
|
|
| 24 | Al Gore's Inconvenient Truth |
Ethos
|
|
| 25 | Barrack Obama's Remarks in Prague |
Logos and Ethos
|
|
| 26 | Individual Presentations-1 |
Evaluation Sheet #1 |
|
| 27 | Individual Presentations-2 |
Evaluation Sheet #2 |
|
| 28 | Individual Presentations-3 |
Evaluation Sheet #3 |
Class Format
Recommendations for Private Study
Grade Evaluation Method
| Kind | Percentage | Grading Criteria etc. |
|---|---|---|
| Final Examination (Written) | 0 | |
| Report Examination (A report to be submitted by the unified deadline) |
0 | |
| Exams and/or Reports other than those stated above, and Continuous Assessment (Evaluation of Everyday Performance in Class) |
100 | Class Participation 70%
|
Grade Evaluation Method (Note)
Advice to Students on Study and Research Methods
Textbooks
| Title | Author | Publisher | ISBN Code | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| From Critical Thinking to Argument | Sylvan Barnet and Hugo Bedau | Beadford/St.Martin’s・ | ISBN-10: 1457649950 ISBN-13: 978-1457649950 | Published on Sept., 2013 |
Textbooks (Frequency of Use, Note)
Reference Books
| Title | Author | Publisher | ISBN Code | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aristotle On Rhetoric :A theory of civic Discourse, Second Edition | George A. Kennedy | Oxford University press | 978-0-19-530509-8 |
Reference Books (Frequency of Use, Note)
Web Pages for Reference
(great historical speeches)
How to Communicate with the Instructor In and Out of Class(Including Instructor Contact Information)
Other Comments
URL:https://secure.ritsumei.ac.jp/students/pathways-future/course/curriculum.html/